背景知識 — Writing Task 2 評価基準(4軸)
| 軸 | 略称 | 内容 |
|---|---|---|
| Task Response | TR | 設問への回答・主張の明確さ |
| Coherence & Cohesion | CC | 段落構成・接続語・流れの一貫性 |
| Lexical Resource | LR | 語彙の多様性・正確さ |
| Grammatical Range & Accuracy | GRA | 文法の幅広さ・正確さ |
問題文
In many countries, governments spend large amounts of money on public libraries. Some people believe this money would be better spent on other public services. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
構成ガイド
Body 1: 主な根拠1 + 具体例
Body 2: 主な根拠2 + 具体例
Conclusion: 立場の再確認 + 含意
有用表現
ヒント
ヒント1
賛成論点: デジタルデバイドの是正 / 教育機会の均等化 / 地域コミュニティの拠点
反対論点: 医療・交通インフラの方が緊急性が高い / デジタル化で必要性が低下
モデル解答(Band 7.5〜8.0相当)
Governments worldwide allocate considerable funds to public libraries, and critics increasingly question whether this investment is justified. While proponents of redirecting this money to other services raise valid points, I firmly believe that public libraries remain indispensable institutions that warrant sustained financial support.
To begin with, public libraries serve as powerful equalizers in society by providing free access to books, computers, and educational resources. Children from disadvantaged backgrounds benefit enormously from well-funded libraries. Studies conducted in OECD countries consistently show that communities with robust library systems demonstrate higher literacy rates and improved academic outcomes.
Furthermore, modern public libraries have evolved far beyond their traditional role as book repositories. They now serve as vital community hubs offering digital literacy programmes and employment support. Approximately 15-20% of households in developed nations still lack reliable internet access, and for these individuals, libraries provide an essential bridge across the digital divide.
Admittedly, some argue that funds allocated to libraries could more effectively address pressing needs such as healthcare or infrastructure. While this concern is understandable, it presents a false dichotomy. A better-educated population ultimately reduces the long-term burden on social services.
In conclusion, the evidence strongly suggests that investment in public libraries generates substantial benefits that extend well beyond the provision of reading materials. Reducing this investment would be short-sighted and ultimately counterproductive.
272語
モデル解答の解説(4軸分析)
| 評価軸 | ポイント |
|---|---|
| TR | 完全同意の立場を明確に宣言 / Concessionで反論を認めてから反駁 |
| CC | To begin with / Furthermore / Admittedly / In conclusion |
| LR | powerful equalizers / social dividends / vital community hubs / false dichotomy |
| GRA | 関係代名詞節 / 分詞構文 / 名詞化 |
よくある日本人のミス
| ミス | 正しい書き方 |
|---|---|
| 立場が不明確 | "I firmly believe that..."と明示 |
| Conclusionで新情報 | Conclusionは要約のみ |
| 語数250語未満 | 書き終わったら語数カウント |
自己評価
次回予告:Day 021 — Writing Task 2(テクノロジーと人間関係)