背景知識 — Writing Task 2 評価基準(4軸)
| 軸 | 略称 | 内容 |
|---|---|---|
| Task Response | TR | 設問への回答・主張の明確さ |
| Coherence & Cohesion | CC | 段落構成・接続語・流れの一貫性 |
| Lexical Resource | LR | 語彙の多様性・正確さ |
| Grammatical Range & Accuracy | GRA | 文法の幅広さ・正確さ |
問題文
Some people believe that modern technology has improved human relationships by making communication easier. Others argue that these technologies have weakened genuine human connections. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
構成ガイド
Body 1: 主な根拠1 + 具体例
Body 2: 主な根拠2 + 具体例
Conclusion: 立場の再確認 + 含意
有用表現
ヒント
ヒント1
肯定側: 遠距離関係の維持 / 共通趣味コミュニティの形成
否定側: スマホ依存による対面交流の減少 / テキスト中心の感情表現の貧困化
モデル解答(Band 7.5〜8.0相当)
Modern technology has profoundly changed how people interact, sparking debate about whether it strengthens or erodes human bonds. While some see digital tools as catalysts for closer relationships, others believe they undermine genuine connection. I would argue that technology is a double-edged sword, and its impact depends largely on how it is used.
Proponents of technology point to its remarkable ability to bridge geographical distances. Platforms such as video calling applications and social media allow people separated by thousands of miles to maintain close relationships in real time. A parent working abroad can still witness a child's first steps, and friends from different continents can share daily experiences instantly.
However, critics rightly observe that digital communication often promotes superficial interactions at the expense of deeper bonds. Many people scroll through social media rather than engaging meaningfully with those sitting beside them. Research suggests that heavy smartphone use during social gatherings reduces the quality of face-to-face conversation.
In conclusion, modern technology offers both opportunities and risks for human relationships. While it undeniably facilitates connection across distances, it can simultaneously erode the quality of close, in-person relationships if used without mindfulness. The key lies in conscious, intentional use of these tools.
236語(本番では250語以上)
モデル解答の解説(4軸分析)
| 評価軸 | ポイント |
|---|---|
| TR | "While some see... others believe... I would argue" で両側+自分の立場を提示 |
| CC | while / Proponents of / However / In conclusion で論理展開 |
| LR | double-edged sword / catalysts for / at the expense of / mindfulness |
| GRA | 関係代名詞節 / 仮定的表現 |
よくある日本人のミス
| ミス | 正しい書き方 |
|---|---|
| 立場が不明確 | "I firmly believe that..."と明示 |
| Conclusionで新情報 | Conclusionは要約のみ |
| 語数250語未満 | 書き終わったら語数カウント |
自己評価
次回予告:Day 022 — Reading(先延ばしの心理学)