Day 140 — Reading: The Race for Deep-Sea Metals

2026-09-01 Phase 3〜4 混在 — Band 6.5〜7.0 目標 Reading(火曜) Yes/No/Not Given + Table Completion + Multiple Choice(TWO) | 13問 | 20分

背景知識

Reading Day — 火曜

今日は Academic Reading — Resources / Environmental Policy(資源・環境政策) の練習です。テーマは 「深海鉱物資源開発(Deep-Sea Mining)」 — これまで扱っていなかった3つの要素を組み合わせます。

True/False/Not Given と Yes/No/Not Given の違い

この2つは似ていますが、問われている対象が根本的に異なります。

項目True/False/Not GivenYes/No/Not Given
問われる対象パッセージに書かれている客観的事実との一致筆者の主張・意見との一致
出題されやすい文章説明文・レポート型(事実の記述が中心)論説文・議論型(賛否・評価が含まれる)
判定の鍵「本文にこの事実が書かれているか」「筆者はこの意見に同意しているように読めるか」
よくある誤り事実として正しくても筆者の主張ではない箇所を根拠にしてしまう"proponents argue" のような第三者の意見を筆者自身の主張と混同する
今日のテーマ: 深海鉱物資源開発
今回のパッセージは深海鉱物資源開発の是非をめぐる論説的な内容のため Yes/No/Not Given が採用されています。「賛成派はこう主張している」という記述と「筆者自身がそう考えている」という記述を区別する練習が今日のポイントです。
設問形式今日の出題数攻略ポイント
Yes/No/Not Given6問(Q1〜6)筆者自身の主張か、第三者(proponents等)の主張かを区別する
Table Completion4問(Q7〜10)表の対比構造(Land-based vs Deep-sea)を先に把握してから本文を探す
Multiple Choice(TWO answers)2問(Q11〜12)5択中「本文に根拠がある2つ」を積極的に選ぶ。部分点なし
Multiple Choice(単一)1問(Q13)設問が問う「中心的な対立点」に直接対応する選択肢を選ぶ

Yes/No/NG・Table Completion・MC(TWO) 攻略法

  • STEP 1設問文を読み、これが「筆者の主張」を問うYes/No/Not Givenであることを確認する
  • STEP 2本文中の "argue" "point out" "suggest" 等の動詞に注目し、誰の意見として書かれているかを見分ける
  • STEP 3Table Completionは表のカテゴリー(行見出し)を先に読み、対比構造を頭に入れてから該当段落を探す
  • STEP 4Multiple Choice(TWO answers)は5択すべてを「本文に明記されているか」で機械的にチェックし、根拠のある2つを選ぶ
最頻出の落とし穴: 第三者の主張を筆者の主張と混同する
"Proponents argue that..." のように紹介される意見は、筆者自身の見解ではない。Yes/No/Not Givenで筆者の主張を問われた際、この種の記述だけを根拠にすると誤答(多くはNOT GIVEN)につながる。

パッセージ

⏰ 目安: パッセージ読解 8分 / 設問 12分
READING PASSAGE

THE RACE FOR DEEP-SEA METALS

A The transition to renewable energy and electric vehicles has sharply increased global demand for a small number of metals, including cobalt, nickel, manganese and copper, all of which are essential components of batteries and other clean-energy technologies. As accessible land-based deposits of these metals become scarcer and more expensive to extract, mining companies and some governments have turned their attention to an unlikely source lying on the ocean floor: polymetallic nodules, potato-sized rocks rich in exactly the metals the green transition requires.
B These nodules form exceptionally slowly, growing by only a few millimetres every million years as minerals dissolved in seawater precipitate around a fragment of shell or rock. The largest known deposits lie scattered across the seabed of the Clarion-Clipperton Zone in the Pacific Ocean, at depths of between 4,000 and 6,000 metres. To harvest them, mining companies deploy large collector vehicles that crawl slowly across the ocean floor, using suction or mechanical arms to gather nodules before pumping them, mixed with seawater and sediment, up a riser pipe to a surface vessel.
C Proponents of deep-sea mining argue that it offers a cleaner alternative to some forms of land-based extraction. Nodules typically contain a higher concentration of valuable metals than many land ores, meaning that less material needs to be processed to yield the same quantity of metal. Advocates also point out that a significant share of the world's cobalt currently comes from artisanal mines in the Democratic Republic of Congo, where labour conditions, including the use of child labour, have drawn international criticism; shifting extraction to the seabed, they argue, could reduce reliance on such supply chains.
D Marine scientists, however, warn that the environmental risks of seabed mining remain poorly understood and potentially severe. The deep sea hosts slow-growing, long-lived organisms adapted to a stable, dark environment, and many species found on and around nodule fields exist nowhere else. Once a collector vehicle disturbs the seabed, the sediment plumes it generates can drift for many kilometres, smothering filter-feeding organisms and altering water chemistry far beyond the immediate mining site. Because deep-sea ecosystems recover so slowly, researchers estimate that damaged seabed communities could take many decades, or even centuries, to return to anything resembling their original state.
E Responsibility for regulating mining in international waters falls to the International Seabed Authority, or ISA, a United Nations-affiliated body that has spent more than a decade negotiating a draft Mining Code that has yet to be finalised. Several Pacific island states and environmental groups have called for a moratorium on commercial seabed mining until its ecological impact is better understood, while some mining companies and other governments argue that a two-year procedural rule obliges the ISA to consider mining applications even before regulations are complete. This disagreement reflects a deeper tension at the heart of the debate: whether the economic opportunity presented by seabed metals should be pursued now, or whether environmental precaution should take priority until the risks are better known.
F The outcome of this debate remains uncertain. Improvements in battery recycling and the development of technologies that require smaller quantities of critical metals could eventually ease pressure on both land and seabed sources, but neither is expected to eliminate demand in the near term. Whatever is decided, the way the ISA and its member states resolve the question of deep-sea mining is likely to set an important precedent for how humanity governs the vast areas of ocean floor that lie beyond any single nation's jurisdiction.

設問

Questions 1–6: Yes / No / Not Given
Do the following statements agree with the claims of the writer in the passage?

Write: YES if the statement agrees with the claims of the writer / NO if the statement contradicts the claims of the writer / NOT GIVEN if it is impossible to say what the writer thinks about this
1
Demand for metals such as cobalt and nickel has increased because of the growth of renewable energy and electric vehicles.
YES NO NOT GIVEN
2
Deep-sea mining companies currently extract nodules using divers who collect them by hand.
YES NO NOT GIVEN
3
Deep-sea mining completely avoids the ethical problems associated with land-based cobalt mining.
YES NO NOT GIVEN
4
Recovery of damaged deep-sea ecosystems could take many decades.
YES NO NOT GIVEN
5
All countries agree that a moratorium on deep-sea mining should be introduced immediately.
YES NO NOT GIVEN
6
The International Seabed Authority has already finalised its regulatory code for commercial mining.
YES NO NOT GIVEN

クリックすると選択肢がハイライトされます(採点機能ではありません。答え合わせは下の「解答・解説」セクションで)。

Questions 7–10: Table Completion
Complete the table below. Use NO MORE THAN TWO WORDS from the passage for each answer.
CategoryLand-based miningDeep-sea nodule mining
Typical locationOpen-pit or underground minesOcean floor at depths of 4,000–6,000 metres
Extraction methodExcavators and drilling equipment(7) ______ vehicles
Main environmental concernDeforestation and water pollution(8) ______ plumes disturbing marine life
Global regulator (international waters)National governments(9) ______
Current regulatory statusEstablished national laws(10) ______ Mining Code
Questions 11–12: Multiple Choice (choose TWO letters, A–E)
Which TWO of the following are given in the passage as reasons deep-sea mining is considered environmentally risky?
11–12
  • A.Ecosystems in the deep sea are slow to recover from disturbance.
  • B.Nodule formation depletes oxygen levels in the atmosphere.
  • C.Sediment plumes can travel far from the mining site and affect marine life.
  • D.Deep-sea mining releases more greenhouse gases than land-based mining.
  • E.Robotic vehicles are more expensive to operate than human divers.
Question 13: Multiple Choice
Choose the correct letter, A, B, C or D.
13
According to the passage, the central point of disagreement about deep-sea mining is
  • A.whether metal demand will continue to rise in the future
  • B.whether economic opportunity should be prioritised over environmental precaution
  • C.whether robotic vehicles are safe to operate at extreme depths
  • D.whether recycling can fully replace the need for newly mined metals

有用な語彙・表現

語彙・表現日本語訳使用例
polymetallic nodule (n. phrase)多金属団塊(複数の金属を含む塊状鉱物)polymetallic nodules, potato-sized rocks rich in...
precipitate (v.)(溶質が)析出する、沈殿するminerals dissolved in seawater precipitate around a fragment of shell
collector vehicle (n. phrase)採取用の走行機械large collector vehicles that crawl slowly across the ocean floor
artisanal mine (n. phrase)小規模・手作業による鉱山artisanal mines in the Democratic Republic of Congo
sediment plume (n. phrase)堆積物の拡散雲the sediment plumes it generates can drift for many kilometres
smother (v.)覆って窒息させるsmothering filter-feeding organisms
moratorium (n.)一時停止措置、モラトリアムcalled for a moratorium on commercial seabed mining
procedural rule (n. phrase)手続き上の規則a two-year procedural rule obliges the ISA to consider...
precedent (n.)前例likely to set an important precedent
jurisdiction (n.)管轄権beyond any single nation's jurisdiction

ヒント

本文中に "proponents argue" "advocates point out" のように第三者の主張として紹介されている箇所は、筆者自身の主張ではない。設問文が「筆者の主張」を問うている場合、その箇所を根拠にNOT GIVENと判断すべきケースが多い。

表が「Land-based mining」と「Deep-sea nodule mining」を対比する形になっているため、左列の内容(例: Extraction method=Excavators)に対応する段落で、右列の同じカテゴリーの記述を探すと効率的。

5択中2つが正解、3つがディストラクター。すべての選択肢を「本文に明記されているか」で機械的にチェックし、根拠のある2つを選ぶ。部分点はないため、曖昧なまま1つだけ確信して残り1つを勘で選ぶのは避ける。


解答・解説

問解答根拠(パッセージ)
1 YES Paragraph A: "The transition to renewable energy and electric vehicles has sharply increased global demand for a small number of metals"
2 NO Paragraph B: "mining companies deploy large collector vehicles that crawl slowly across the ocean floor" — 人ではなく機械が採取する
3 NOT GIVEN Paragraph C は "advocates argue"(賛成派の主張)としてサプライチェーン依存を減らせる可能性を述べているのみで、筆者が「完全に回避する」と断言している箇所はない
4 YES Paragraph D: "damaged seabed communities could take many decades, or even centuries, to return to anything resembling their original state"
5 NO Paragraph E: 一部の国・団体はモラトリアムを求める一方、他の企業・政府は採掘継続を主張しており、"all countries agree" とは書かれていない
6 NO Paragraph E: "negotiating a draft Mining Code that has yet to be finalised" — まだ最終化されていない
判定のポイント: Q3は「advocates argue(賛成派が主張している)」という第三者の意見の紹介を、筆者自身の主張と混同しないことが鍵。パッセージ中で誰の意見として書かれているかを常に意識する。
問解答根拠(パッセージ)
7 collector Paragraph B: "mining companies deploy large collector vehicles that crawl slowly across the ocean floor"
8 sediment Paragraph D: "the sediment plumes it generates can drift for many kilometres, smothering filter-feeding organisms"
9 ISA Paragraph E: "the International Seabed Authority, or ISA, a United Nations-affiliated body"
10 draft Paragraph E: "negotiating a draft Mining Code that has yet to be finalised"
判定のポイント: 表の各行が「Land-based mining」と「Deep-sea nodule mining」を対比する構造になっているため、対応する段落(B・D・E)で同じカテゴリーについて書かれている箇所を探すと発見が速い。

正解: A と C

選択肢判定根拠
A正解Paragraph D: "The deep sea hosts slow-growing, long-lived organisms... damaged seabed communities could take many decades... to return"
B誤りパッセージに酸素濃度・大気への言及はない
C正解Paragraph D: "the sediment plumes it generates can drift for many kilometres, smothering filter-feeding organisms and altering water chemistry"
D誤り温室効果ガス排出量の比較についての記述はない
E誤り費用比較についての記述はない
判定のポイント: 5択のうち、本文に直接の根拠がある選択肢は2つだけ(A・C)。B・D・Eは「もっともらしいが本文に書かれていない」ディストラクター。消去法よりも「本文に明記された根拠を持つ選択肢を積極的に探す」姿勢が有効。

正解: B

Paragraph E: "This disagreement reflects a deeper tension at the heart of the debate: whether the economic opportunity presented by seabed metals should be pursued now, or whether environmental precaution should take priority until the risks are better known."

判定のポイント: Aは事実として本文に書かれているが「対立の中心点」ではない。C・Dは本文に記述がない内容。設問が問う「中心的な対立点」に直接対応するのはBのみ。

よくある日本人のミス

ミス原因正しいアプローチ
Yes/No/Not Givenで「事実として正しいかどうか」で判定してしまう True/False/Not Givenとの区別ができておらず、常に客観的事実の有無を探してしまう 設問が「筆者の主張」を問うていることを常に意識し、誰の意見として書かれているかを確認する
第三者の主張("advocates argue")を筆者自身の主張と混同する 引用符や動詞(argue, claim, suggest)のニュアンスを読み飛ばす 意見の帰属を示す動詞(argue/claim/point out等)に印をつけながら読む習慣をつける
Table Completionで表の見出し(カテゴリー)を読まずに本文を探し始める 表全体の構造を把握する前に個別の空所だけを見てしまう 表のタイトル行・カテゴリー列を先に読み、対比構造を頭に入れてから本文を探す
Multiple Choice (TWO answers)で1つ選んで満足してしまう 通常のMultiple Choiceと同じ感覚で1つ選んで次に進んでしまう 設問文に "choose TWO" とある場合、必ず2つ選ぶまで確認する習慣をつける
ディストラクター(もっともらしいが本文にない内容)を選んでしまう 一般常識やありそうな話として選択肢を判断してしまう 選択肢の内容が本文のどの文に対応するかを必ず指させるレベルまで根拠を特定してから選ぶ

次のステップ

発展: Paragraph Cの"advocates argue"の部分を、筆者自身の見解を示す文(例: "The writer suggests that...")に書き換えるとどう変わるか、英語で1文書いてみる
次回予告(水曜): Vocabulary & Grammar — 分詞構文(Participial phrases)

自己評価

問題を解いた後に記入してください。データはブラウザのローカルストレージに保存されます。

気づき・メモ(間違えた問題・理由・次回への課題):